Boxing legends trash Canelo, was 'boring'

Boxing legends trash Canelo, was 'boring'

Boxing legends and savants have stored analysis on Canelo Alvarez following his consistent choice win over Gennady Golovkin in a set of three battle between the two on Saturday night. The Mexican won on focuses and protected his super middleweight titles, however many fans and savants were not fulfilled.

Large numbers of the fighters portrayed the session as "unremarkable" and Chris Eubank Jr. proposed that Golovkin drop down to middleweight and battle him or quit.

Large names in boxing conceded that the Kazakh seldom undermined his adversary in the ring and sensibly the Mexican won on focuses after 116:112, 115:113 AND 115:113. Canelo declared after the battle that he wanted hand a medical procedure.

Enzo Maccarinelli depicted the match best when that's what he expressed "Canelo won a lot simpler than the scorecards recommend." The previous welterweight title holder stated: "9:3 in rounds and that is being liberal. Two conflicts, one still first class and the other not. Boxing involves time."

Former welterweight champion Paul Malignaggi wrote: “Canelo had paint in his back pocket the whole time. It wasn't impressive. Benavidez is the real test in the category, not Golovkin."

Former super middleweight champion Caleb Trox was succinct: "those are three of the worst judges' cards in history." Sergi Mora echoed the same sentiment, adding: “Reading these cards is causing more problems than Canelo had in 12 rounds. 115:113, wow”.